Original research / Hiap Tong

Hiap Tong’s Profit Fell 83%: What Does That Mean for Its Dividend?

Hiap Tong made S$278,000 in the half-year ended 30 September 2026, down from S$1.68 million a year earlier. Cash generation held up better than profit, but substantial lease payments and fleet spending make the full-year results important for its next dividend decision.

Dividends.sg ·

Hiap Tong Corporation (SGX: 5PO) reported a steep fall in profit for the six months ended 30 September 2026. For dividend investors, the question is whether its cash generation tells a more reassuring story than its earnings. The unaudited results, announced on 12 November, offer a mixed answer. [S1, p. 3] [S1, p. 25]

The group made S$278,000, down from S$1.68 million in the comparable half-year. The board declared no interim dividend, saying it wants to review full-year performance before making a dividend decision. That follows the same approach as the previous half-year, when it also declared no interim dividend. [S1, p. 3] [S1, p. 24] [S3, p. 23] [S3, p. 24]

Why profit fell despite higher revenue

Revenue rose from S$45.19 million to S$47.00 million, and gross profit increased from S$7.95 million to S$9.18 million. Higher demand helped Singapore lifting and haulage revenue. Those gains did not reach the bottom line: the group recorded S$1.96 million of other losses, while profit before tax fell from S$2.29 million to S$603,000. [S1, p. 3] [S1, p. 17]

The largest item was a S$1.63 million loss on disposal of equipment, which management linked to crane fleet renewal. A S$388,000 provision for expected losses on receivables also weighed on the period; the comparable period recorded a reversal instead. The disposal loss helps explain the earnings drop, but adding it back would not by itself establish a recurring profit level. Equipment renewal and customer collections still matter to future cash flow. [S1, p. 13] [S1, p. 18]

Cash came in, but the fleet demanded cash too

Operating activities generated S$8.90 million, versus S$12.18 million a year earlier. The decline partly reflects cash tied up in receivables: the cash-flow statement shows a S$2.50 million outflow from changes in trade and other receivables, compared with a S$1.65 million inflow in the previous half-year. [S1, p. 8] [S1, p. 21]

Cash spending on property, plant and equipment was S$1.35 million. After that spending, operating cash flow was S$7.54 million. This is only a partial view of cash available to shareholders: lease payments of S$10.73 million and interest paid of S$749,000 appear under financing activities, outside operating cash flow. Borrowing proceeds and repayments also moved cash during the period. [S1, p. 8]

The cash purchase figure does not capture every equipment commitment. The group reported S$5.17 million of equipment acquired during the half-year, with S$3.82 million payable to an external supplier. Investors should therefore watch how fleet renewal affects later cash payments, as well as whether receivables turn into cash. [S1, p. 8]

What the dividend decision says

Hiap Tong paid a 0.1 Singapore cent first and final dividend, totalling S$317,000, during this half-year. That was a payment relating to an earlier dividend, not a new interim payout for the period just reported. At 30 September, group cash stood at S$8.99 million, against S$7.00 million of current bank borrowing and S$31.30 million of total lease liabilities. These balances describe the group’s position at that date; they do not settle what the board can or will distribute next. [S1, p. 8] [S1, p. 15] [S1, p. 16] [S1, p. 23]

The immediate answer is clear: there is no HY2027 interim dividend. Whether another final dividend follows depends on the full-year result and the cash left after equipment, lease and financing needs. The next results should show whether the disposal loss was confined to this period and whether operating cash flow recovers. [S1, p. 18] [S1, p. 23] [S1, p. 24]